AIchieve

Solutions / Projects

AIchieve for Projects

Budget · Spend · Capex

Every project inside the group plan, not beside it

Project budgets, spend, commitments and forecast to complete, with capex, depreciation and cash flowing straight into the three statements. Project owners update their own numbers, and finance sees the effect the same day.

Connects to your ERP, purchasing and timesheets. Live in hours.

The project lifecycle

From business case to depreciation, on one model

Every stage of a project connected to the group plan as it happens. Pick a stage to see it in AIchieve.

Before anything is approved

Build the case on the same numbers as the plan

Capital cost, phasing and benefits are modelled against the operations and revenue plans they depend on, so NPV, IRR and payback are calculated on the business as it is planned, not on a standalone sheet.

  • NPV, IRR and payback at your hurdle rate
  • Benefits linked to the plans that deliver them
  • Sensitivity to delays and cost overruns
Explore business cases
AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Business Case

Business Case · Warehouse Automation

Scenario: Business caseEntity: UKHorizon: 5 yearsRate: 10%+
At 10% discount rate

£210K

NPV

Hurdle 12%

16.2%

IRR

Cumulative cash

3.3 yrs

Payback

Phased over 3 quarters

£1.20M

Capital budget

Cash Flows and Benefits

£K · benefits linked to the operations plan for Manchester · capital phased into cash flow

£KY0Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Total
Capital cost(1,200)—————(1,200)
Labour savings—1802502602652701,225
Throughput margin—130170180190195865
Maintenance—(30)(40)(40)(45)(45)(200)
Net cash flow(1,200)280380400410420+690

AI Overview

Planner

Warehouse automation clears the 12% hurdle with an IRR of 16.2%. If the throughput gains arrive a year late, payback stretches from 3.3 to 3.8 years.

Submit for approvalRun sensitivity
  • Benefits linked to the operations plan
  • Capital phased into cash flow
  • Sensitivity to late benefits

When a request comes in

Approve against the budget that is actually left

Requests route by value, type and department, and each one is checked against remaining budget and cash headroom as it is submitted. Approvers see the effect on the group plan before they sign off.

  • Approval routes by value and type
  • Headroom checked on submission
  • Approved spend flows into the plan straight away
Explore approvals
AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Project Approvals

Project Approvals

Scenario: Budget FY2026Entity: AllQuarter: Q3Status: All+
This quarter

4

Requests in pipeline

Within remaining budget

£207K

Value within plan

Needs executive approval

£310K

Outside current plan

From current portfolio

£112K

CAPEX headroom

Requests and Approval Routes

£K · routed by value, type and department · budget and cash headroom checked on submission

RequestDeptType£KPaybackBudgetStage
Dublin racking upgradeOperationsCapex642.1 yrsWithin planFinanceIn review
Riyadh DC phase 2OperationsCapex31014.8%Not in planExecutiveTo approve
Sales CRM rolloutSalesOpex48—Within planCompleteApproved
Data warehouseFinanceCapex953.0 yrsWithin planDepartmentDraft

AI Overview

Planner

Riyadh phase 2 needs £310K that is not in the plan. The £112K of portfolio headroom covers a third of it, so the rest needs a funding decision at the executive review.

Route to executiveCompare timing
  • Approval routes by value and type
  • Headroom checked on submission
  • 1 request outside plan

Every week

See spend and commitments as they happen

Invoices, purchase orders and timesheets are read from your systems and matched to each project. Actuals and open commitments sit side by side, so a timing difference is never mistaken for an overrun.

  • Actuals from ERP and timesheets
  • Open purchase orders as commitments
  • Timing separated from overrun
Explore project spend
AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Spend & Commitments

Spend & Commitments

Scenario: Actual vs BudgetEntity: AllPeriod: H1 FY26Project: All+
57% of forecast

£1.26M

Spent to date

From purchase orders

£470K

Open commitments

Behind budget phasing

−£67K

H1 timing variance

Spending ahead of budget

+£46K

ERP migration

Portfolio Spend vs Budget Phasing

£K · actual to June · purchase orders due from July · £67K behind phasing

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep

Spend by Project

H1 · £K · against budget phasing

ProjectBudgetActualVarPOs
Riyadh fit out380412+3296
ERP migration250296+4688
Warehouse650538(112)270
Carrier switch4512(33)16

AI Overview

Analyst

Portfolio spend is £67K behind budget phasing, and most of that is timing: warehouse automation is waiting on equipment delivery. ERP migration is spending £46K ahead of its budget.

Review ERP migrationDrill to invoices
  • Actuals from ERP and timesheets
  • Open purchase orders as commitments
  • ERP migration ahead of budget

Every month

Forecast at completion, owned by the people delivering

Project owners update forecast to complete for their own projects, split between what is committed and what is still an estimate. Finance reviews, approves, and the group plan and cash flow update with it.

  • Owner forecasts captured in the model
  • Committed and estimate separated
  • Contingency tracked across the portfolio
Explore project forecasting
AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Forecast to Complete

Forecast to Complete

Scenario: Rolling ForecastEntity: AllYear: FY2026Owner: All+
Budget £2.32M

£2.20M

Forecast at completion

Under budget

+£112K

Portfolio variance

£470K committed

£945K

Forecast to complete

Awaiting approval

1

Owner update to review

Forecast at Completion by Project

£K · owner forecasts split into committed and estimate · flows to the group plan on approval

ProjectBudgetActualCmtEstForecastVar
Riyadh fit out6204129676584+36Approved
ERP migration4102968854438(28)To approve
Warehouse automation1,2005382703321,140+60Approved
Benelux carrier switch8512161341+44Approved

AI Overview

Planner

The ERP migration owner updated the forecast yesterday and it is now £28K over, driven by data migration. Releasing £28K of warehouse contingency covers it without changing group CAPEX.

Approve with contingencyAsk the owner
  • Owner forecasts captured in the model
  • Committed and estimate separated
  • 1 update awaiting approval

As assets go live

Capex, assets and depreciation without the rework

Spend is split into capital and operating cost by cost line, using your policy. Assets under construction build on the balance sheet, and depreciation starts from the in-service date over the useful life you set.

  • Capex and opex split by cost line
  • Assets created on the in-service date
  • Depreciation in the P&L and balance sheet
Explore capitalisation
AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Capitalisation

Capitalisation & Depreciation

Scenario: Rolling ForecastEntity: AllYear: FY2026Policy: Group+
Across 3 projects

£1.91M

CAPEX at completion

On the balance sheet

£1.08M

Assets under construction

From in-service dates

£27K

Depreciation FY2026

Once all are live

£245K

Annual depreciation

Assets and Depreciation

£K · capex and opex split by cost line under your capitalisation policy · depreciation from the in-service date

ProjectCapexAUCIn serviceLifeAnnualFY26
Riyadh fit out540380Sep10 yrs5418
ERP migration262180Nov5 yrs529
Warehouse automation1,110520Jan FY278 yrs139—
Benelux carrier switch——Expensed———

AI Overview

Analyst

Depreciation steps up to £245K a year once all three assets are in service. Moving the Riyadh in-service date to October takes £5K out of this year's charge.

Review asset registerDrill to cost lines
  • Capex and opex split by cost line
  • Assets created on the in-service date
  • Depreciation in P&L and balance sheet
Who works in it

One portfolio, every role

Each person works on their part of the same numbers, so the portfolio, the forecast and the group plan never drift apart.

Project owners

Update forecast to complete and milestones against the budget they were given. No monthly spreadsheet to send round.

Forecast · Spend · Budget

PMO

See every project's spend, commitments and forecast together, with the ones drifting from budget flagged early.

Portfolio · Commitments · Risk

Finance

Get capex, opex, depreciation and cash straight into the group plan, coded the way the ledger expects.

Capex · Depreciation · Cash

Leadership

Compare funding options with their full financial and operational effect before the investment decision.

Scenarios · Returns · Headroom

Three statements

Every project, in all three statements

Spend is split into capital and operating cost as it is coded. Capital builds assets and then depreciation, operating cost lands in the P&L, and both reach cash flow when they are paid. Nothing is rekeyed into the group plan.

Riyadh fit out£584K
ERP migration£438K
Warehouse automation£1.14M
Benelux carrier switch£41K

Capital

£1.91M

Builds assets, then depreciation

Operating

£291K

Expensed as incurred

BSBalance sheet

Assets under construction
£1.08M
Fixed assets on completion
£1.91M

P&LProfit and loss

Operating project cost
£291K
Depreciation, FY2026
£27K

CFCash flow

Capital spend, investing
£1.91M
Operating spend
£291K

Coded once

Each cost line is classified under your capitalisation policy as it arrives from the ERP, not reclassified at month end.

Depreciation that starts itself

Assets move from under construction to fixed assets on the in-service date, and depreciation follows over the useful life you set.

Cash when it is paid

Payment timing comes from purchase orders and invoices, so the cash flow shows when money actually leaves, project by project.

Portfolio decisions

Decide what to fund, delay or stop

Defer a project, add one or change its phasing, and see capital spend, depreciation, cash and the operational effect side by side. The base plan stays untouched until you promote a version.

AIchieve
← Back to BoardsBoards/Portfolio Scenarios

Portfolio Scenarios

Scenario: 3 versionsEntity: AllYear: FY2026Driver: Project timing+
Base plan

£1.91M

Capital spend FY2026

A · defer warehouse

£1.63M

Capital spend FY2026

B · Riyadh phase 2

£2.22M

Capital spend FY2026

Base untouched

3

Statements regenerated

Portfolio Scenario Comparison

FY2026 · P&L, balance sheet and cash flow regenerated for each version · operational effect from the operations plan

MeasureBase planA · Defer warehouse one quarterB · Add Riyadh phase 2 in Q4
FY2026Valuevs baseValuevs base
CF Capital spend £K1,9121,634(278)2,222+310
BS Net cash, December £K1,8402,118+2781,530(310)
CF Cash runway14.2 mo15.9 mo+1.712.6 mo(1.6)
P&L Depreciation FY2027 £K245210(35)276+31
OPS Manchester go liveJanApr+1 qtrJan—
OPS Riyadh peak utilisation120%120%—94%(26 pts)
Plan of recordCurrentVersionVersion

AI Overview

Planner

Deferring warehouse automation one quarter frees £278K of cash this year, but leaves Manchester on third party overflow for three more months. Riyadh phase 2 brings KSA peak utilisation from 120% to 94%.

Compare versionsPromote to plan
  • Project timing moved as a driver
  • Three statements regenerated
  • Operational effect from the operations plan
Questions

What project and finance teams ask us

Anything not covered here, we would rather answer on your own portfolio.

Other teams

Every team that projects depend on

Same model, same live data. Adding a team is a permission, not a project.

Finance

Owns the model. Forecasting, scenarios, reporting, variance and close on one connected view.

Explore

Sales and marketing

Revenue plans, quota, territory and capacity that add up to the number finance is forecasting.

Explore

Headcount and HR

Hiring plans, ramp, attrition and cost per head modelled against capacity and margin.

Explore

Operations and supply

Demand, inventory, capacity and cost per unit linked to the margin and cash they drive.

Explore

Bring your project tracker and your CAPEX plan.

Your own projects and your own model. See forecast at completion, open commitments, and the capex, depreciation and cash each project puts into the group plan, before the next investment committee.

✓ Your project tool stays as it is

✓ Your data, not a sample dataset

✓ Your capitalisation policy, as you set it